[rt2x00-users] [PATCH 6/9] rt2x00: Finish rt3070 support in rt2800 register initialization.
Ivo van Doorn
ivdoorn at gmail.com
Thu Apr 8 22:33:47 UTC 2010
On Thursday 08 April 2010, Gertjan van Wingerde wrote:
> rt2x00 had preliminary support for RT3070 based devices, but the support was
> incomplete.
> Update the RT3070 register initialization to be similar to the latest Ralink
> vendor driver.
>
> With this patch my rt3070 based devices start showing a sign of life.
>
> Signed-off-by: Gertjan van Wingerde <gwingerde at gmail.com>
> @@ -1086,7 +1084,7 @@ EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(rt2800_link_tuner);
> */
> int rt2800_init_registers(struct rt2x00_dev *rt2x00dev)
> {
> - u32 reg;
> + u32 reg, reg2;
> unsigned int i;
>
> rt2800_register_read(rt2x00dev, WPDMA_GLO_CFG, ®);
> @@ -1204,11 +1202,18 @@ int rt2800_init_registers(struct rt2x00_dev *rt2x00dev)
> rt2x00_set_field32(®, BKOFF_SLOT_CFG_CC_DELAY_TIME, 2);
> rt2800_register_write(rt2x00dev, BKOFF_SLOT_CFG, reg);
>
> - if (rt2x00_is_usb(rt2x00dev) &&
> - rt2x00_rt(rt2x00dev, RT3070) && rt2x00_rev(rt2x00dev) == 0x0200) {
> + if (rt2x00_rt(rt2x00dev, RT3070)) {
> rt2800_register_write(rt2x00dev, TX_SW_CFG0, 0x00000400);
> - rt2800_register_write(rt2x00dev, TX_SW_CFG1, 0x00000000);
> - rt2800_register_write(rt2x00dev, TX_SW_CFG2, 0x00000000);
> +
> + if (rt2x00_rev(rt2x00dev) < 0x0201) {
> + reg = 0x00000000;
> + reg2 = 0x0000002c;
> + } else {
> + reg = 0x00080606;
> + reg2 = 0x00000000;
> + }
> + rt2800_register_write(rt2x00dev, TX_SW_CFG1, reg);
> + rt2800_register_write(rt2x00dev, TX_SW_CFG2, reg2);
Might as well put the rt2800_register_write call into the if, rather then storing
it into variables first. That way it is consistent with the rest of the code.
> @@ -1751,6 +1739,28 @@ int rt2800_init_rfcsr(struct rt2x00_dev *rt2x00dev)
> rt2x00_set_field8(&bbp, BBP4_BANDWIDTH, 0);
> rt2800_bbp_write(rt2x00dev, 4, bbp);
>
> + if (rt2x00_rt(rt2x00dev, RT3070) && rt2x00_rev(rt2x00dev) < 0x0201)
> + rt2800_rfcsr_write(rt2x00dev, 27, 0x03);
> +
> + rt2800_register_read(rt2x00dev, OPT_14_CSR, ®);
> + rt2x00_set_field32(®, OPT_14_CSR_BIT0, 1);
> + rt2800_register_write(rt2x00dev, OPT_14_CSR, reg);
> +
> + rt2800_rfcsr_read(rt2x00dev, 17, &rfcsr);
> + rt2x00_set_field8(&rfcsr, RFCSR17_R2, 0);
> + rt2x00_eeprom_read(rt2x00dev, EEPROM_RSSI_BG2, &eeprom);
> + if ((eeprom & 0x07) >= 1)
Might be nicer to do the access using rt2x00_get_field16,
plus some name for this magical field in the header file.
> + rt2x00_set_field8(&rfcsr, RFCSR17_R1, eeprom & 0x07);
> + rt2800_rfcsr_write(rt2x00dev, 17, rfcsr);
> +
> + if (rt2x00_rt(rt2x00dev, RT3070)) {
> + rt2800_rfcsr_read(rt2x00dev, 27, &rfcsr);
> + rfcsr &= 0x77;
> + if (rt2x00_rt(rt2x00dev, RT3070) && rt2x00_rev(rt2x00dev) < 0x0201)
> + rfcsr |= 0x03;
> + rt2800_rfcsr_write(rt2x00dev, 27, rfcsr);
> + }
Any ideas what these fields mean? Could set_field8 and _get_field8 simplify the code?
Ivo
More information about the users
mailing list