[rt2x00-users] [PATCH 4/9] rt2x00: Remove rt2800 version constants.

Julian Calaby julian.calaby at gmail.com
Thu Apr 8 23:53:17 UTC 2010

On Fri, Apr 9, 2010 at 08:32, Ivo van Doorn <ivdoorn at gmail.com> wrote:
> On Thursday 08 April 2010, Gertjan van Wingerde wrote:
>> The rt2800 version constants are inconsistent, and the version number don't
>> mean a lot of things anyway. Use the literal values in the code instead of
>> some sort of fabricated version name macro.
>> Signed-off-by: Gertjan van Wingerde <gwingerde at gmail.com>
> Perhaps a more elegant way of using and defining needs to be found.
> But at least the defined show what the purpose for the values is
> rather then having magical values spread around the code.

Maybe something like:

#define RTDEV_IS_RT2883_R1(dev) (rt2x00_rt(dev, RT2883) && \
                                                   rt2x00_rev(dev) < 0x0300)



Julian Calaby

Email: julian.calaby at gmail.com
.Plan: http://sites.google.com/site/juliancalaby/

More information about the users mailing list