[rt2x00-users] [RFC] rt2x00: Implement tx mpdu aggregation
Helmut Schaa
helmut.schaa at googlemail.com
Wed Jun 9 15:17:40 UTC 2010
In order to implement tx mpdu aggregation we only have to implement
the ampdu_action callback such that mac80211 allows negotiation of
blockack sessions.
The hardware will handle everything on its own as long as the ampdu
flag in the TXWI struct is set up correctly and we translate the tx
status correctly.
For now, refuse requests to start rx aggregation.
Signed-off-by: Helmut Schaa <helmut.schaa at googlemail.com>
---
This gets me a 10% boost in throughput when actually using tx aggregation ;)
but needs the RFC I sent yesterday.
I didn't try if failed frames get handled correctly but that should be
done in hw as well.
And I'm not sure if this works on usb devices. So maybe we should enable
it only on pci and soc?
Helmut
drivers/net/wireless/rt2x00/rt2800lib.c | 34 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++-
drivers/net/wireless/rt2x00/rt2x00dev.c | 10 +++++++++
2 files changed, 43 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/net/wireless/rt2x00/rt2800lib.c b/drivers/net/wireless/rt2x00/rt2800lib.c
index 16c3ae8..161ff0f 100644
--- a/drivers/net/wireless/rt2x00/rt2800lib.c
+++ b/drivers/net/wireless/rt2x00/rt2800lib.c
@@ -2490,7 +2490,8 @@ int rt2800_probe_hw_mode(struct rt2x00_dev *rt2x00dev)
IEEE80211_HW_HOST_BROADCAST_PS_BUFFERING |
IEEE80211_HW_SIGNAL_DBM |
IEEE80211_HW_SUPPORTS_PS |
- IEEE80211_HW_PS_NULLFUNC_STACK;
+ IEEE80211_HW_PS_NULLFUNC_STACK |
+ IEEE80211_HW_AMPDU_AGGREGATION;
SET_IEEE80211_DEV(rt2x00dev->hw, rt2x00dev->dev);
SET_IEEE80211_PERM_ADDR(rt2x00dev->hw,
@@ -2742,6 +2743,36 @@ static u64 rt2800_get_tsf(struct ieee80211_hw *hw)
return tsf;
}
+static int rt2800_ampdu_action(struct ieee80211_hw *hw,
+ struct ieee80211_vif *vif,
+ enum ieee80211_ampdu_mlme_action action,
+ struct ieee80211_sta *sta,
+ u16 tid, u16 *ssn)
+{
+ struct rt2x00_dev *rt2x00dev = hw->priv;
+ int ret = 0;
+
+ /* we don't support RX aggregation yet */
+ switch (action) {
+ case IEEE80211_AMPDU_RX_START:
+ case IEEE80211_AMPDU_RX_STOP:
+ ret = -ENOTSUPP;
+ break;
+ case IEEE80211_AMPDU_TX_START:
+ ieee80211_start_tx_ba_cb_irqsafe(vif, sta->addr, tid);
+ break;
+ case IEEE80211_AMPDU_TX_STOP:
+ ieee80211_stop_tx_ba_cb_irqsafe(vif, sta->addr, tid);
+ break;
+ case IEEE80211_AMPDU_TX_OPERATIONAL:
+ break;
+ default:
+ WARNING(rt2x00dev, "Unknown AMPDU action\n");
+ }
+
+ return ret;
+}
+
const struct ieee80211_ops rt2800_mac80211_ops = {
.tx = rt2x00mac_tx,
.start = rt2x00mac_start,
@@ -2759,5 +2790,6 @@ const struct ieee80211_ops rt2800_mac80211_ops = {
.conf_tx = rt2800_conf_tx,
.get_tsf = rt2800_get_tsf,
.rfkill_poll = rt2x00mac_rfkill_poll,
+ .ampdu_action = rt2800_ampdu_action,
};
EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(rt2800_mac80211_ops);
diff --git a/drivers/net/wireless/rt2x00/rt2x00dev.c b/drivers/net/wireless/rt2x00/rt2x00dev.c
index 826cab2..856ea1e 100644
--- a/drivers/net/wireless/rt2x00/rt2x00dev.c
+++ b/drivers/net/wireless/rt2x00/rt2x00dev.c
@@ -286,6 +286,16 @@ void rt2x00lib_txdone(struct queue_entry *entry,
rt2x00dev->low_level_stats.dot11ACKFailureCount++;
}
+ /*
+ * Every single frame has it's own tx status, hence report
+ * every frame as ampdu of size 1
+ */
+ if (tx_info->flags & IEEE80211_TX_CTL_AMPDU) {
+ tx_info->flags |= IEEE80211_TX_STAT_AMPDU;
+ tx_info->status.ampdu_len = 1;
+ tx_info->status.ampdu_ack_len = success ? 1 : 0;
+ }
+
if (rate_flags & IEEE80211_TX_RC_USE_RTS_CTS) {
if (success)
rt2x00dev->low_level_stats.dot11RTSSuccessCount++;
--
1.6.4.2
More information about the users
mailing list