[rt2x00-users] [PATCH] rt2x00 : RT3290 chip support v4

Stanislaw Gruszka sgruszka at redhat.com
Mon Jul 9 19:14:08 AEST 2012

On Fri, Jun 22, 2012 at 09:45:49AM +0200, Helmut Schaa wrote:
> > +#define RT3290_POWER_BOUND     0x27
> > +#define RT3290_FREQ_OFFSET_BOUND       0x5f
> >  #define RT5390_POWER_BOUND     0x27
> >  #define RT5390_FREQ_OFFSET_BOUND       0x5f
> Any reason why we cannot reuse the existing defines as they seem to be equal?
> Maybe we could just remove the prefix?

Because before that would conflict with some other patch, now we can merge
those two defines.


More information about the users mailing list